Pashupati Cotsp. (PASHUPATI)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 31/100 — RISKY

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹84.65
Market Cap₹1,336.12 Cr
P/E Ratio98.91
ROCE11.79%
ROE—%
Dividend Yield0.06%
Profit Growth265.1%
Debt/Equity0.6
Sales Growth9.7%
Promoter Holding65.99%
52-Week Range₹67.31 — ₹118.35
SectorTextiles & Apparels
Book Value₹10.82

AI Analysis

AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.

Looking at Pashupati Cotsp, my first reaction is caution. This is a textile player with a market cap of ₹1,578 crore, but it earns very little. The trailing P/E of 98.91 means investors are paying nearly 99 rupees for every one rupee of profit. Book value is just ₹10.15, so the price-to-book of 8.57 is far above anything Graham would call a margin of safety. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹148 crore and net profit of only ₹3 crore — that is a thin margin, and annualised profit would not justify the valuation. The reported 236.25% profit growth looks impressive, but sales actually fell 10.24%. A profit jump on declining revenue is often a low-base effect or one-time gain, not a durable moat. ROCE at 11.79% is modest; debt-to-equity of 0.57 is manageable, and promoter holding of 65.99% is good. Piotroski score of 6/9 is okay but not outstanding. The FairStock score of 28/100 labels it risky, and I agree. In textiles, cycles are brutal; without pricing power or a strong brand, margins stay thin. The 0.05% dividend yield offers no compensation while waiting. I cannot identify an enduring moat from these numbers. Even with a PEG of 0.42, that ratio is only meaningful if growth is predictable, and this growth is not. This is a cyclical, not a compounder. I would wait for a much lower price, stronger balance sheet, and evidence that sales are growing again before considering it.

The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer