NIKE, Inc. (NKE)

Stalwart

FairStock Score: 43/100 — MIXED

Key Financials

Current Price$41.88
Market Cap$83.5B
P/E Ratio27.55
ROE16.02%
Dividend Yield3.82%
SectorConsumer Cyclical

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

I've spent decades studying consumer businesses, and Nike presents a classic paradox of our era: tremendous brand power overshadowed by questionable valuation. Let me be direct: at a P/E of 30.63 and trading $45.78 above Graham's intrinsic value estimate of $10.75, we're looking at a margin of safety of -426%—a red flag I cannot ignore. The business itself is quality. Nike commands a dominant global moat through brand equity and distribution; its ROE of 17.95% demonstrates efficient capital deployment, and $2.6B in free cash flow is respectable. The latest quarter showed $12.4B in revenue with 6.37% net margins. However, here's where prudence demands caution: the Piotroski F-Score of just 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health, ROCE of only 5.02% suggests capital inefficiency despite high ROE, and that bloated EV/EBITDA of 74x is indefensible. The firm's leverage at 0.80 D/E ratio is manageable, but the Altman Z-Score of 2.91 sits uncomfortably in the gray zone. Revenue and profit growth metrics are absent—troubling omissions. This is a magnificent business at a ridiculous price. I've learned that the best time to buy exceptional companies is when Mr. Market offers them at reasonable valuations. Today is not that day. Nike belongs on a watchlist, not a buy list, until valuation returns to earth or we see accelerating growth justify this premium.

Bull Case

Nike's brand remains unmatched in athletic footwear and apparel, capable of sustaining pricing power through economic cycles. Direct-to-consumer expansion and digital transformation could unlock margin expansion and accelerate growth, justifying premium valuations seen by luxury brands like LVMH.

Bear Case

At 74x EV/EBITDA with declining financial metrics and minimal ROCE, Nike appears to be a mature cash cow priced for perfection. Any misstep in brand perception, competitive disruption from Adidas or On, or macroeconomic weakness could trigger rapid multiple compression and 30-40% downside.

Data from SEC filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer