NiSource Inc. (NI)
Slow GrowerFairStock Score: 48/100 — MIXED
Key Financials
| Current Price | $46.3 |
| Market Cap | $22.5B |
| P/E Ratio | 23.03 |
| ROE | 9.11% |
| Dividend Yield | 2.57% |
| Sector | Utilities |
Strengths
- Regulated utility moat with predictable, essential service revenues across five states
- Low beta of 0.62 provides defensive portfolio characteristics during market volatility
- Solid net profit margin of 13.55% in latest quarter demonstrates operational efficiency
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicates reasonable financial strength in selected metrics
- Market cap of $22.5B provides liquidity and analyst coverage
Concerns
- Negative free cash flow of -$1.1B and -2.3% FCF yield indicate capital consumption rather than generation
- Elevated debt-to-equity of 1.39 combined with distress-level Altman Z-Score of 0.61 raises solvency questions
- EV/EBITDA of 45x is extraordinarily expensive for a utility with modest growth prospects
- ROE of 9.07% paired with P/B of 2.28 means paying premium prices for below-average equity returns
AI Analysis
NiSource presents a classic regulated utility proposition—steady, defensive, but uninspiring from a value perspective. The company operates natural gas and electric distribution networks across five states, providing essential infrastructure with regulatory-protected returns. That's the moat: durable, predictable cash flows backed by regulatory frameworks. However, the financial metrics trouble me considerably. A negative free cash flow of $1.1 billion and -2.3% FCF yield suggest the company is consuming rather than generating cash despite $1.9 billion in quarterly revenue. The debt-to-equity ratio of 1.39 is elevated for a utility, and the Altman Z-Score of 0.61 sits in distress territory. The EV/EBITDA multiple of 45x is punishingly high—I'd expect 10-15x for a regulated utility. At a P/B of 2.28 with only 9.07% ROE, shareholders are paying premium prices for mediocre returns on equity. The Piotroski score of 7/9 is decent but masks underlying cash generation problems. While the low beta of 0.62 offers defensive characteristics, I cannot justify paying $47 per share for a company burning cash and weighted down by debt. The latest quarter's 13.55% net margin is respectable, but margins mean little when free cash flow turns negative. This is infrastructure masquerading as an investment—suitable only for those seeking utility-grade stability, not value.
Bull Case
NiSource benefits from essential infrastructure positioning and regulatory-protected returns that provide steady earnings regardless of economic cycles. Infrastructure modernization investments and potential rate increases could improve FCF generation and justify current valuations over a multi-year period.
Bear Case
Negative free cash flow sustainability raises questions about dividend viability and debt servicing capacity. Rising interest rates increase borrowing costs for a leveraged balance sheet, while regulatory constraints limit pricing power and growth potential in a stagnant demand environment.
Data from SEC filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer