Neptune Pet. (NEPTUNE)
CyclicalFairStock Score: 47/100 — MIXED
Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹209 |
| Market Cap | ₹507.44 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 18.96 |
| ROCE | 62.28% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 12.88% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 19.29% |
| Promoter Holding | 69.33% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹165 — ₹220 |
| Sector | Chemicals & Petrochemicals |
Strengths
- Outstanding ROCE of 62.28% indicates highly efficient capital deployment
- Sales growth of 19.29% shows expanding business momentum
- Promoter holding of 69.33% ensures strong alignment with minority shareholders
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 points to solid financial fundamentals
- PEG of 1.18 suggests valuation is broadly fair for the growth rate
Concerns
- Profit growth of 12.88% lags sales growth of 19.29%, implying margin compression
- Zero dividend yield even with high ROCE raises questions about cash allocation
- Latest quarter net profit margin is thin at ~3.7%, reflecting low pricing power
- Missing book value, ROE, and debt/equity data limits a thorough value assessment
- Petrochemical cyclicality makes earnings vulnerable to commodity price swings
AI Analysis
Neptune Pet. presents a curious case. A petrochemical player earning a remarkable 62% ROCE, trading at a P/E of 18.96 with a PEG of 1.18. At first glance, that suggests efficient capital use. But I always ask: can this be sustained? The petrochemical industry is cyclical, and commodity businesses seldom build durable moats. Sales are growing at 19%, yet profit trails at under 13% - a telltale sign that rising input costs or competition are squeezing margins. The latest quarter's net profit of ₹15 Cr on ₹407 Cr sales is a thin 3.7% margin. That's not a franchise with pricing power; it's a price-taker. The promoter holding of 69% is reassuring - their interests align with mine. But zero dividend? A company with this return profile should be generating cash; if they can't pay me a token, I want to know where the cash flows. The Piotroski score of 7 suggests solid fundamentals, but I'm worried about the missing data - no book value, no ROE, no debt-to-equity. I cannot evaluate financial strength in a vacuum. At ₹209, I'm paying 19 times earnings for a cyclical with moderate growth. That's not a margin of safety. If the cycle turns, this stock could get punished. I'd wait for a cheaper price or evidence of widening margins. For now, it's a good business perhaps, but not a good investment at this price.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer