Namo eWaste (NAMOEWASTE)
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹184.7 |
| Market Cap | ₹397.55 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 39.32 |
| ROCE | 19.08% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 30.9% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 30.66% |
| Promoter Holding | 69.05% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹134 — ₹389.45 |
| Sector | Other Utilities |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
Let me look at Namo eWaste as a business, not a ticker. It has grown sales by 30.66% and profits by 30.90% — that is the kind of compounding that draws my attention. ROCE at 19.08% is respectable; it tells me existing capital is being put to work reasonably well. A Piotroski score of 7 out of 9 also suggests the balance sheet and operations are sound. Promoters owning 69.05% aligns their interest with mine. But I am not going to pay any price for a good business. At ₹184.70, the P/E of 39.32 implies the market expects this 30% growth to continue for a long time. The PEG of 1.28 is not outrageous, but it leaves little margin for error. I am troubled by what I cannot see: no book value, no debt-to-equity, no ROE. A business that does not disclose these numbers is not something Graham would call attractive. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹87 Cr and net profit of ₹7 Cr, yet the stated P/E suggests trailing earnings of roughly ₹10 Cr; I need to understand that inconsistency before I can value the stock. Also, the share price is far below its 52-week high of ₹319.40 — maybe Mr. Market has sobered up. There is no dividend, so my only return must come from future earnings growth and eventually a reasonable exit price. This is a fast grower in a promising waste-management space, but I would need clearer financial reporting and a lower price to build a margin of safety. I will watch it, not chase it.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer