Nagarjuna Fert. (NAGAFERT)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹2.37 |
| Market Cap | ₹141.74 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | 0% |
| ROE | 3.04% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 0% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| Promoter Holding | 51.77% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹1.98 — ₹5.69 |
| Sector | Fertilizers & Agrochemicals |
| Book Value | ₹-18.65 |
Strengths
- Promoter holding of 51.77% shows owners remain invested and incentivized to address distress.
- Price of ₹4 is above the 52-week low of ₹2.41, leaving room for recovery if fundamentals stabilize.
- Sales growth of 105.01% demonstrates the business can generate revenue movement, albeit from a low base.
- Small market cap of ₹261 Cr makes the company a potential candidate for restructuring or takeover.
Concerns
- Negative book value of ₹-14.93 per share means shareholders' equity cushion has been completely eroded.
- Latest quarter net loss of ₹-6 Cr on sales of ₹8 Cr shows severe unprofitability and cash burn.
- Piotroski F-Score of 3/9, ROCE of 0%, and profit growth of -118.63% signal weak operational health.
- Debt/Equity is N/A due to negative equity, raising solvency and going-concern risk.
AI Analysis
Let me approach Nagarjuna Fert as I would any business: first protect the principal, then seek return. The very first number I see is ₹-14.93 book value per share. That is not a balance sheet; that is an empty cushion. Graham warned to buy assets with a margin of safety, and here there are no net assets to cover me if operations keep losing money. The latest quarter makes the problem clear: sales of ₹8 Cr generated a net loss of ₹6 Cr. That is not a temporary blip; that is a business destroying value. ROCE is 0%, profit growth is -118.63%, and P/E is meaningless because earnings are absent. Debt/equity is N/A only because equity is negative. A Piotroski score of 3 out of 9 reinforces my caution. At ₹4, the stock is closer to the middle of its 52-week range, so there is no statistical bargain just because the price is low. The promoter holding of 51.77% is one positive, because owners are still in the game and have incentive to repair the capital structure. Sales growth of 105.01% seems eye-catching, but with quarterly sales of only ₹8 Cr, it is a low-base effect, not evidence of a durable moat. Fertilizer is a cyclical, commodity industry in which a maker has little pricing power. I would need to see positive book value, consistent operating profits, and a credible plan to reduce leverage. Until then, this is not an investment; it is a speculation in a turnaround. If you buy here, you're hoping management or government policy saves the day—not looking at a foundation built on sound assets.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer