Arcelor Mittal NY Registry Shares NEW (MT)
StalwartFairStock Score: 49/100 — MIXED
Key Financials
| Current Price | $60.15 |
| Market Cap | $45.5B |
| P/E Ratio | 15.75 |
| ROE | 5.43% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.89% |
| Sector | Basic Materials |
Strengths
- Conservative balance sheet with debt-to-equity of just 0.24, providing financial flexibility
- Established organization with 1,25,554 employees providing operational scale
Concerns
- Anemic revenue growth of 1.8% for a company of this size limits long-term upside
- Altman Z-Score of 1.6 places it in the financial distress zone—elevated bankruptcy risk
AI Analysis
Arcelor Mittal NY Registry Shares NEW is a mid-cap basic materials company valued at $45.5 billion. The business generates $61.4 billion in annual revenue with a 0.3% net margin. From a quality standpoint, Arcelor shows distressed Altman Z-Score of 1.6 warrants caution and modest 6% ROE. On valuation, the stock is attractively valued at 14.5x earnings, with a modest 26% margin of safety vs Graham Number. Growth dynamics show revenue growing at 1.8% and profit growth of 145.4%. The 1.0% dividend yield adds an income component for patient holders. Our composite FairStock Score of 54/100 reflects mixed fundamentals overall. Investors should weigh the business quality against the current price and their own margin of safety requirements.
Bull Case
Improving fundamentals and sector tailwinds could drive meaningful earnings growth, compressing the effective multiple for patient investors. Operational leverage in the business model means incremental revenue growth could disproportionately boost bottom-line profitability.
Bear Case
Macro headwinds or sector-specific disruption could pressure margins, particularly if competitive intensity increases in the basic materials space. Sluggish 2% growth in a large-cap company leaves the stock vulnerable to de-rating if the market rotates toward higher-growth opportunities.
Data from SEC filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer