Meghmani Organi. (MOL)
CyclicalFairStock Score: 17/100 — RISKY
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹63.23 |
| Market Cap | ₹1,608.03 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 24.99 |
| ROCE | 3.39% |
| ROE | 8.91% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 42.2% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.47 |
| Sales Growth | -12.27% |
| Promoter Holding | 48.98% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹36.5 — ₹87.75 |
| Sector | Fertilizers & Agrochemicals |
| Book Value | ₹61.55 |
Strengths
- Trades below book value at P/B 0.87, offering a potential asset cushion if the balance sheet is sound
- Promoter holding of 48.98% aligns majority shareholder interests with minority investors
- Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests moderate financial health, not severe distress
- Debt/equity of 0.55 is manageable for a cyclical downturn
Concerns
- ROCE of just 3.39% indicates poor return on capital employed
- Latest quarter reported a net loss of ₹4 Cr despite ₹509 Cr of sales
- Sales growth is negative at -10.51%, showing a shrinking top line
- Trailing P/E of 33.10 with no dividend offers little margin of safety
AI Analysis
Meghmani Organi is the kind of name that looks tempting only if you ignore the mathematics of compounding. At ₹53.49, the stock trades at 0.87 times book value of ₹61.81. Buying assets at a discount sounds like Graham, but Graham also insisted on satisfactory earning power. Here, ROCE is just 3.39% and ROE is 8.91%. That means the capital employed is not generating acceptable returns; book value is not a reliable floor when returns are this weak. The latest quarter says it all: ₹509 Cr of sales still produced a net loss of ₹4 Cr. Sales are down 10.51%, and there is no dividend to compensate you while you wait. The reported profit growth of 19.59% looks misleading against a loss-making quarter and a trailing P/E of 33.10. At 33 times earnings, you are paying a rich multiple for a business whose profits are thin and unpredictable. The Piotroski score of 6/9 and debt/equity of 0.55 are not alarming, but they do not offset weak economics. Promoter holding at 48.98% is decent, yet minority shareholders should demand better capital allocation. This looks like a cyclical company caught in a downswing. As a value investor, I am not interested in apparent cheapness if underlying earning power is deteriorating. I would wait for evidence of restored margins and return on capital before considering entry. Until then, the risk-reward is unattractive.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer