Landmark Cars (LANDMARK)
CyclicalFairStock Score: 19/100 — RISKY
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹511.65 |
| Market Cap | ₹2,121.55 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 56.79 |
| ROCE | 7.99% |
| ROE | 6.69% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.29% |
| Profit Growth | 110.2% |
| Debt/Equity | 1.74 |
| Sales Growth | 22.7% |
| Promoter Holding | 49.76% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹339.5 — ₹662.8 |
| Sector | Automobiles |
| Book Value | ₹141.14 |
Strengths
- Promoter holding at 49.76% aligns owner-manager interests
- Revenue growth of 12.56% shows business expansion
- Profit growth of 35.48% indicates recent earnings momentum
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 reflects improving financials
- Latest quarter is profitable with ₹14 Cr net profit on ₹1,345 Cr sales
Concerns
- Extremely high P/E of 69.02 against low ROE of 6.69%
- Thin net margin: ₹14 Cr profit on ₹1,345 Cr sales
- High debt/equity of 1.67 with ROCE of 7.99% barely covering capital cost
- PEG of 2.87 suggests growth is not cheap; dividend yield is negligible at 0.12%
AI Analysis
As a value investor, I find little here to excite me. Landmark Cars is an auto dealer—an asset-heavy, low-margin business. Latest quarter net profit is ₹14 Cr on ₹1,345 Cr sales, a margin near 1%. That leaves no cushion. Return on equity is 6.69%, and ROCE is only 7.99%; with debt/equity of 1.67, that return is not strong enough to compensate for leverage. The company is profitable, and Piotroski F-score of 7/9 suggests recent operational improvement. Sales grew 12.56% and profit grew 35.48%, but from a thin base. The problem is valuation: P/E is 69.02, price is 3.14 times book value, and PEG at 2.87 tells me I am not paying a reasonable price for growth. Dividend yield of 0.12% is almost nothing for a shareholder waiting. Promoter holding 49.76% is decent, but ownership alone does not create a moat. Dealerships generally lack pricing power; they are exposed to cycles, inventory, and working capital stress. FairStock score of 12/100 reinforces my caution. Even a good business at a fancy price becomes a bad investment. Here I have a cyclical, capital-hungry dealer with thin margins and high leverage. Benjamin Graham would ask for a margin of safety, and at ₹416.75 I do not see one. The stock trades well below its 52-week high of ₹662.80, but that only means the crowd left; it does not mean the price is cheap. I would prefer to watch from the sidelines until either earnings power improves meaningfully, debt falls, or the price drops to a level where the balance sheet and earnings provide real protection. No rush.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer