Kolibri Global Energy Inc. Common stock (KGEI)
StalwartFairStock Score: 46/100 — MIXED
Key Financials
| Current Price | $6.11 |
| Market Cap | $200M |
| P/E Ratio | 16.08 |
| ROE | 6.79% |
| Dividend Yield | —% |
| Sector | Energy |
Strengths
- Conservative balance sheet with debt-to-equity of just 0.25, providing financial flexibility
Concerns
- Revenue declining at 17.3% year-over-year signals potential demand weakness or market share loss
- Weak Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 suggests deteriorating financial quality across multiple dimensions
- Altman Z-Score of 0.8 places it in the financial distress zone—elevated bankruptcy risk
AI Analysis
Kolibri Global Energy Inc. Common stock is a micro-cap energy company valued at $200 million. The business generates $57 million in annual revenue with a 7.8% net margin. From a quality standpoint, Kolibri shows weak Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 signaling deteriorating fundamentals and distressed Altman Z-Score of 0.8 warrants caution. On valuation, the stock is attractively valued at 12.9x earnings, with a modest 25% margin of safety vs Graham Number. Growth dynamics show revenue growing at -17.3% and profit growth of -42.2%. Our composite FairStock Score of 46/100 reflects mixed fundamentals overall. Investors should weigh the business quality against the current price and their own margin of safety requirements.
Bull Case
Improving fundamentals and sector tailwinds could drive meaningful earnings growth, compressing the effective multiple for patient investors. Operational leverage in the business model means incremental revenue growth could disproportionately boost bottom-line profitability.
Bear Case
Macro headwinds or sector-specific disruption could pressure margins, particularly if competitive intensity increases in the energy space. Regulatory changes, input cost inflation, or demand normalization represent underappreciated risks that could materially impact forward estimates.
Data from SEC filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer