Kesoram Inds. (KESORAMIND)

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹11.7
Market Cap₹363.48 Cr
P/E Ratio0
ROCE-4.71%
ROE2,414.64%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth132.82%
Debt/Equity0.59
Sales Growth5.9%
Promoter Holding43.34%
52-Week Range₹4.55 — ₹14.31
SectorCement & Cement Products
Book Value₹11.91

AI Analysis

AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.

At ₹10.53, this is not the kind of business I would normally spend a minute on. Cement is a commodity, and Kesoram has no obvious moat. The price-to-book of 1.41 means I am paying a premium to the ₹7.47 book value, not getting a margin of safety. The trailing P/E of 0.00 is meaningless because earnings are absent. Indeed, ROCE is -4.71%, so existing capital is not even earning its keep. Why would I want to compound into a business that destroys value? True, the latest quarter shows ₹6 crore net profit on ₹65 crore sales — roughly a 9% margin — and profit growth of 132.82% sounds exciting, but from a low or negative base, percentages deceive. Sales are down 1.07%; there is no underlying growth. Debt/equity of 0.58 is serviceable, not frightening, and promoter holding at 43.34% shows some alignment. But no dividend means the only return is price appreciation, which depends on a genuine turnaround. The Piotroski score of 5/9 is mediocre, not a green light. I need evidence that ROCE turns positive and stays positive. If the company can keep earning ₹6 crore per quarter with stable cement pricing and pay down debt, perhaps it becomes an asset-backed turnaround. But today, buying at 1.41 times book with negative return on capital is speculation, not investment. In Graham's terms, there is no adequate margin of safety. I will wait for either a cheaper price, preferably below book, or several quarters of improving returns before committing capital.

The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer