Godfrey Phillips (GODFRYPHLP)

Stalwart

FairStock Score: 63/100 — STEADY

Score breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹2,149
Market Cap₹33,520.48 Cr
P/E Ratio24.51
ROCE26.32%
ROE24.48%
Dividend Yield2.33%
Profit Growth-51.4%
Debt/Equity0.04
Sales Growth98.84%
Free Cash Flow₹509 Cr
Promoter Holding72.58%
52-Week Range₹1,832.1 — ₹3,947
SectorCigarettes & Tobacco Products
Book Value₹398.29

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Reading the numbers, I see a business with the kind of economics I admire, but the price tests my discipline. Godfrey Phillips earns a return on equity of 24.48% and returns on capital of 26.32%, with virtually no debt—debt-to-equity of 0.03. That is a fortress balance sheet. Free cash flow of ₹509 crore supports the dividend, and promoter holding of 72.58% aligns owners with management. The growth is real: five-year revenue CAGR of 17.32%, latest profit up 27.51%, and a recent quarter with ₹343 crore net profit on ₹1,829 crore sales. A Piotroski score of 7 and Altman Z of 5.08 confirm financial health. The moat? Cigarettes are a sin business with pricing power and high barriers to entry. But I cannot ignore valuation. At ₹2,153, the stock trades at 25.42 times earnings, 6.40 times book, and an EV/EBITDA of 33.45. Graham's number says intrinsic value is around ₹789, and even a conservative DCF tells me ₹536. The negative margin of safety is a red flag. The market is paying a premium for past growth. With PEG at 1.57, the current price already discounts continued momentum. I like the business. I always have. But value investing demands a margin of safety. At this price, I would wait, not chase. If the stock were to correct meaningfully, or if earnings grow into the valuation over years, Godfrey Phillips could be a fine holding. For now, it is a great company at an unattractive price. I would keep it on my watchlist and let patience be my advantage.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer