GHCL (GHCL)
CyclicalFairStock Score: 53/100 — MIXED
Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 1/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹429 |
| Market Cap | ₹3,932.4 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 7.66 |
| ROCE | 24.19% |
| ROE | 16.16% |
| Dividend Yield | 2.8% |
| Profit Growth | 32.05% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.02 |
| Sales Growth | -3.06% |
| Promoter Holding | 19.83% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹417.25 — ₹667.2 |
| Sector | Chemicals & Petrochemicals |
| Book Value | ₹395.15 |
Strengths
- Very low debt/equity of 0.03 provides financial resilience through commodity downcycles.
- Healthy return ratios: ROE of 16.16% and ROCE of 24.19% indicate efficient capital use.
- Modest valuation with P/E of 8.69, P/B of 1.44, and dividend yield of 2.50%.
- Latest quarter still generated net profit of ₹106 Cr on sales of ₹757 Cr, showing positive earnings power.
- Book value of ₹349.93 offers a tangible asset base relative to the price of ₹502.35.
Concerns
- Profit growth fell sharply by 37.06% while sales declined 2.85%, signaling cyclical or demand pressure.
- Piotroski F-score of 3/9 indicates deteriorating financial health and possible red flags.
- Promoter holding of only 19.83% raises questions about owner alignment and governance.
- FairStock Score of 29/100 classifies the stock as RISKY, and the 52-week range shows meaningful volatility.
AI Analysis
Let me apply the Graham test to GHCL. A commodity chemical company at ₹502 with a market cap of ₹4,405 Cr. On the surface, the valuation looks cheap—P/E of 8.69 and P/B of 1.44 against book value of ₹349.93. But cheapness must be judged against earnings power and balance sheet. The company has a fortress-like debt profile: D/E of 0.03 and ROCE of 24.19%, suggesting capital allocation has been prudent. ROE of 16.16% is respectable. Yet the current year tells a different story: sales fell 2.85% and profits fell 37.06%. That is not the signature of a business with pricing power; it is the signature of a commodity cyclical. The latest quarter showed net profit of ₹106 Cr on sales of ₹757 Cr, so the operating engine is still working, but the trend is deteriorating. Graham would demand margin of safety. At 8.69 times earnings and 1.44 times book, the market is already offering a discount. However, the Piotroski F-score of 3/9 is a red flag—it signals weak fundamental health and deteriorating profitability. With promoter holding at only 19.83%, minority owners like me must also think about alignment; I prefer owners who eat their own cooking. The 2.50% dividend gives some compensation while waiting, but a falling earnings stream can make a low P/E into a value trap. I would not call GHCL a stalwart. This is a cyclical business, and the cycle is currently against it. The absence of debt is a genuine comfort, but I need evidence of margin stabilization and profit recovery before committing new capital. Price alone is not enough.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer