GE Shipping Co (GESHIP)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 93/100 — HIGH CONVICTION

Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 1/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹1,284.5
Market Cap₹18,338.77 Cr
P/E Ratio4.9
ROCE13.86%
ROE15.86%
Dividend Yield4.48%
Profit Growth236.94%
Debt/Equity0.06
Sales Growth149.47%
Free Cash Flow₹2,499 Cr
Promoter Holding30.08%
52-Week Range₹971.1 — ₹1,798
SectorTransport Services
Book Value₹1,188.12

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At first glance, GE Shipping looks like a value investor's dream: P/E of 8.45, P/B of 1.42, and a price of ₹1,414.40 against a Graham Number of ₹1,886.52 — roughly 29% margin of safety. But I must remind myself that a cheap cyclical bought at the wrong time can be a value trap. The latest quarter shows the cycle is blowing against us: sales fell 8.51% and profits fell 21.65%. Shipping is a commodity business; no company gets to set prices for long. So I look for a balance sheet strong enough to survive rough seas. GE Shipping has one: debt/equity of only 0.08, free cash flow of ₹2,499 Cr, ROE of 15.86%, ROCE of 13.86%, and a Piotroski score of 8/9. The Altman Z-score of 2.24 is in the grey zone, so I don't cheer too loudly. The 5-year revenue CAGR of 9.79% shows good past growth, but last year's negative numbers are a wind from the future. The 2.22% dividend yield is nice, but not reliable enough to build a thesis on. Promoter holding of 30.08% is moderate; I would prefer more owner's skin in the game. The DCF value of ₹9,371 seems too polished for a business where shipping rates swing wildly; I rely more on Graham's margin of safety than on a model with many assumptions. The 52-week range of ₹922.50 to ₹1,798.00 confirms this is a cyclical asset play, not a stalwart. At ₹1,414.40, I am paying a reasonable price, but I need to see freight rates stabilise and quarterly earnings stop deteriorating before committing serious money. Value without catalyst is patience; I can wait.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer