Greif Inc. Class A Common Stock (GEF)
Slow GrowerFairStock Score: 58/100 — STEADY
Key Financials
| Current Price | $62.69 |
| Market Cap | $3.9B |
| P/E Ratio | 25.9 |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 3.57% |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical |
Strengths
- Conservative balance sheet with debt-to-equity of just 0.39, providing financial flexibility
- Attractive 3.4% dividend yield providing steady income returns
- Established organization with 12,000 employees providing operational scale
Concerns
- Revenue declining at 21.4% year-over-year signals potential demand weakness or market share loss
AI Analysis
Greif Inc. Class A Common Stock is a small-cap consumer cyclical company valued at $3.9 billion. The business generates $4.3 billion in annual revenue with a 4.1% net margin. From a quality standpoint, Greif shows Altman Z-Score of 2.1 in the grey zone and conservative leverage at 0.39x debt-to-equity. On valuation, the stock is trading at a premium 25.9x earnings, with trades above its Graham Number with a negative 28% margin. Growth dynamics show revenue growing at -21.4% and profit growth of 1930.2%. The 3.4% dividend yield adds an income component for patient holders. Our composite FairStock Score of 58/100 reflects mixed fundamentals overall. Investors should weigh the business quality against the current price and their own margin of safety requirements.
Bull Case
Improving fundamentals and sector tailwinds could drive meaningful earnings growth, compressing the effective multiple for patient investors. Operational leverage in the business model means incremental revenue growth could disproportionately boost bottom-line profitability.
Bear Case
Macro headwinds or sector-specific disruption could pressure margins, particularly if competitive intensity increases in the consumer cyclical space. Regulatory changes, input cost inflation, or demand normalization represent underappreciated risks that could materially impact forward estimates.
Data from SEC filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer