FTAI Aviation Ltd. Common Stock (FTAI)

FairStock Score: 42/100 — MIXED

Key Financials

Strengths

• High return on equity of 241.2% demonstrating efficient capital deployment
• Altman Z-Score of 4.5 confirms minimal bankruptcy risk and strong solvency
• Revenue growth of 32.7% demonstrates strong top-line momentum

Concerns

• Trades significantly above Graham Number ($18) with negative 1200% margin of safety—limited downside protection
• High leverage at 10.46x debt-to-equity increases financial risk and interest expense burden
• Weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 suggests deteriorating financial quality across multiple dimensions

AI Analysis

FTAI Aviation Ltd. Common Stock is a mid-cap industrials company valued at $24.5 billion. The business generates $2.5 billion in annual revenue with a 4.5% net margin. From a quality standpoint, FTAI shows weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 signaling deteriorating fundamentals and healthy Altman Z-Score of 4.5. On valuation, the stock is commanding a steep 51.3x multiple, with trades far above its Graham Number ($18) with no margin of safety. Growth dynamics show revenue growing at 32.7% and profit growth of 12.8%. Our composite FairStock Score of 43/100 reflects below-average fundamentals overall. Investors should weigh the business quality against the current price and their own margin of safety requirements.

Bull Case

FTAI's 33% revenue growth trajectory could accelerate as it captures additional market share in the industrials sector. Operational leverage in the business model means incremental revenue growth could disproportionately boost bottom-line profitability.

Bear Case

At 51x earnings, any growth disappointment triggers rapid multiple compression—a 20% earnings miss plus multiple contraction to 20x implies 40%+ downside. Regulatory changes, input cost inflation, or demand normalization represent underappreciated risks that could materially impact forward estimates.

Data from SEC filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer