Forge Auto (FORGEAUTO)

Cyclical

Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹97.5
Market Cap₹91.95 Cr
P/E Ratio8.72
ROCE23.64%
ROE—%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth25.31%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth1.23%
Promoter Holding73.63%
52-Week Range₹68.45 — ₹121.95
SectorAuto Components

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let's look at Forge Auto. At ₹97.50, I’m paying ₹92 crore for a business that earned roughly ₹10.5 crore trailing, so the P/E of 8.72 is cheap on its face. The ROCE of 23.64% tells me existing capital is being deployed efficiently. A Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 adds some confidence in the financial statements, and promoter holding of 73.63% means owners have skin in the game. But a Graham-style check doesn't stop at the price tag. Sales grew only 1.23%, while profit grew 25.31%. That means the earnings lift came from margins or cost controls, not from robust demand. That can be good, but it isn't a durable growth engine unless the top line accelerates. I also don't have book value, ROE, or debt-to-equity figures. Without those, I cannot fully measure balance-sheet risk or calculate a proper margin of safety. The company pays no dividend, so I must rely entirely on capital appreciation. In auto components, one must respect the cycle; this is a cyclical business tied to vehicle production and raw-material prices. The 52-week range of ₹68.45 to ₹121.95 shows the stock itself swings with sentiment. At a P/E of 8.72 and a PEG of 0.45, the market seems to be pricing in little growth. If profit growth is sustainable, this could be a bargain; if it is just a cyclical peak, value can turn into a trap. I'd classify this as a Cyclical, not a stalwart. I would want to see sales growth pick up, better disclosure of debt and book value, and proof that margins aren't just a one-time event.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer