Filatex Fash. (FILATFASH)

Asset Play

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹0.18
Market Cap₹150.01 Cr
P/E Ratio43.24
ROCE0.63%
ROE0.12%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth-80%
Debt/Equity0.03
Sales Growth-65.7%
Promoter Holding19.06%
52-Week Range₹0.14 — ₹0.68
SectorTextiles & Apparels
Book Value₹2.95

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At ₹0.29 per share, Filatex Fashion has a market capitalisation of only ₹183 crore while its book value stands at ₹2.86 per share. That 0.10 price-to-book ratio makes it look like a classic Graham asset play. But Benjamin Graham taught me that a bargain price is only meaningful if the underlying assets can generate earnings. Here the earnings engine has collapsed: sales fell 59.51%, profit fell 98.66%, and the latest quarter shows ₹22 crore of sales with zero net profit. A P/E of 43.24 is therefore a statistical curiosity, not a valuation anchor. The balance sheet is clean, with debt/equity of 0.03, and that is a real strength. But liability discipline is not the same as asset productivity. Return on equity is a mere 0.19% and ROCE is 0.63% - the company earns almost nothing on its stated capital. In a low-margin, competitive garments and apparels industry, such poor returns make me question whether the book value is truly productive or just historical cloth left on the shelf. Promoter holding of 19.06% is another warning; I like owners with significant skin in the game. Add a Piotroski F-score of 3/9 and no dividend, and this is not a business I can classify as a quality compounder. The margin of safety here is apparent, not proven. I would call it an asset play, contingent on operational repair. I would not rush in. I need evidence of stabilising sales, improving margins, and management action to close the gap between market capitalisation and intrinsic asset value. Until then, a 0.10 P/B can remain cheap for a long time.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer