Exide Inds. (EXIDEIND)

Slow Grower

FairStock Score: 59/100 — STEADY

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹476.1
Market Cap₹40,468.5 Cr
P/E Ratio43.48
ROCE8.65%
ROE5.94%
Dividend Yield0.42%
Profit Growth27.09%
Debt/Equity0.11
Sales Growth17.47%
Free Cash Flow₹-661 Cr
Promoter Holding45.99%
52-Week Range₹287 — ₹496.4
SectorAuto Components
Book Value₹163.59

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At first glance, Exide wears a familiar Indian business face: a trusted automotive battery brand, conservative leverage, and steady promoter skin in the game. But Benjamin Graham taught me to weigh facts, not hopes. The facts here are priced for perfection. Sales grew only 3.05% and profit 4.15%, while return on equity is a weak 5.94% and ROCE is 8.65%. A business earning this little on capital cannot justify a P/E of 34.13 or an EV/EBITDA of 87.75. The Graham Number – ₹189.11 – versus price ₹347.25 gives a margin of safety of negative 76.78%; that is the arithmetic of overpayment. The balance sheet is decent: debt-to-equity is 0.11 and the Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 suggests no immediate distress. Promoter holding at 45.99% is reassuring. Yet free cash flow is minus ₹661 Cr; accounting profit is not being converted into cash for owners, and that worries me more than any short-term earnings beat. The latest quarter's net profit of ₹195 Cr on ₹4,201 Cr sales is a thin 4.6% margin. The 5-year revenue CAGR of 10.72% shows a past growth engine, but recent numbers suggest the engine has cooled. I would not call it a terrible business; I would call it an ordinary one at an extraordinary price. Markets are paying for a resurgence that the figures do not support. In the bargain philosophy, a great business is not a good investment at any price. Exide needs to show better capital allocation, improved returns, and positive cash flow before I ask for a margin of safety. Until then, I wait.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer