Escorts Kubota (ESCORTS)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 79/100 — STEADY

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹3,113.7
Market Cap₹34,259.23 Cr
P/E Ratio24.75
ROCE13.59%
ROE23.07%
Dividend Yield1.06%
Profit Growth-72.34%
Debt/Equity0.01
Sales Growth20.46%
Free Cash Flow₹809 Cr
Promoter Holding68.04%
52-Week Range₹2,701 — ₹3,987.8
SectorAgricultural, Commercial & Construction Vehicles
Book Value₹1,105.92

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At first glance, Escorts Kubota is a quality business, but not a cheap one. The balance sheet is pristine: debt/equity of 0.01, Altman Z-score of 3.77, and a Piotroski F-score of 8 out of 9. That is the kind of financial health Graham would demand. Return on equity of 23.07% and ROCE of 13.59% tell me management uses retained earnings well. Promoter holding of 68.04% also aligns ownership with minority shareholders. But I have to be honest: this is a cyclical tractor company wearing a growth label. Five-year revenue CAGR is only 7.87%, and latest quarterly sales of ₹3,280 Cr produced ₹358 Cr net profit. The 96.63% profit growth sounds spectacular, but my experience says such jumps often come from a low base after an industry trough. At ₹3,309, the stock trades at 30.22 times earnings and 3.57 times book. The Graham Number—a conservative floor I respect—is only ₹1,994.85. That means I am paying a large premium above what my value screens call reasonable. The DCF figure of ₹3,872.79 gives some headroom, but DCF is only as good as its assumptions, and tractor demand is tied to monsoon and rural sentiment. I also note the negative EV/EBITDA ratio of -37.87; that is an oddity I would want explained before acting. Free cash flow of ₹809 Cr is a genuine plus, and a dividend yield of 0.80% is modest. So, would I buy? Not at this price. I admire the franchise and the clean books, but I want a margin of safety. Today, the margin is missing.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer