Craftsman Auto (CRAFTSMAN)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 56/100 — STEADY

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹10,251
Market Cap₹26,810.91 Cr
P/E Ratio52.91
ROCE11.74%
ROE11.7%
Dividend Yield0.11%
Profit Growth113.3%
Debt/Equity1.11
Sales Growth36.3%
Free Cash Flow₹-1,360 Cr
Promoter Holding48.7%
52-Week Range₹6,324 — ₹11,990
SectorAuto Components
Book Value₹1,368.26

AI Analysis

AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.

Mr. Market is asking ₹10,251 for Craftsman Auto, a ₹26,811 Cr auto-components Fast Grower. The growth is real: sales rose 36.30%, profit 113.30%, and five-year revenue CAGR is 30.70%. Last quarter it sold ₹2,057 Cr and earned ₹107 Cr, a slim net margin. But I must ask what I am paying for that growth. The P/E is 52.91, P/B 7.49, EV/EBITDA 156.45, and the Graham Number is only ₹2,027.13. That gives a margin of safety of -271.26%, meaning the market price is far above the Graham-style value. ROE and ROCE are both around 11.7%, not the high returns I want for a durable moat. Debt/equity is 1.11, and free cash flow is -₹1,360 Cr, so growth is consuming cash. The Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and Altman Z-Score of 3.49 suggest improving fundamentals and some balance-sheet resilience, but neither makes the valuation attractive. Promoter holding of 48.70% aligns interests, yet dividend yield is only 0.11%. The FairStock Score is 56/100, labelled STEADY, while the stock trades near its 52-week high of ₹11,990 against a low of ₹6,324. I see a fast-growing auto ancillary with accounting momentum but weak cash generation, moderate returns, and a rich price. Graham would demand a bargain; here the numbers imply caution, not comfort. I would watch execution, margins, debt, and cash flow before considering it. That is not my kind of bargain.

The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer