Copart, Inc. (CPRT)
Fast GrowerFairStock Score: 66/100 — STEADY
Key Financials
| Current Price | $32.3 |
| Market Cap | $36.5B |
| P/E Ratio | 20.06 |
| ROE | 17.61% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Sector | Industrials |
Strengths
- 31.27% net margins in Q1 2026 demonstrate exceptional operational leverage and pricing power
- Fortress balance sheet with D/E of 0.01 and Altman Z-Score of 29.82, indicating zero financial distress risk
- $1.0B annual free cash flow generation provides ample capital for shareholder returns and reinvestment
- Global marketplace moat with established positions in 11 countries; network effects create switching costs
- Recurring revenue model tied to vehicle insurance claims and salvage volumes—counter-cyclical to economic downturns
Concerns
- Valuation is excessive: EV/EBITDA of 70.97x and Graham Number of $9.07 vs. market price of $37.74 implies -316% margin of safety
- Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 suggests deteriorating fundamentals despite strong reported earnings—warrant deeper scrutiny
- FCF yield of 0.2% is negligible for equity investors seeking meaningful returns on capital
- 52-week range of $33.81-$63.85 reflects significant volatility; potential for sharp correction if growth disappoints
AI Analysis
Let me be direct: Copart presents a paradox that troubles me. On one hand, this is a genuinely excellent business. The core model is beautiful—a digital marketplace with 31.27% net margins, generating $1 billion in annual free cash flow, servicing a recurring need: salvaged vehicle auctions. The competitive moat is formidable; they've built network effects and switching costs that are difficult to replicate. With only 0.01 debt-to-equity and a Z-score of 29.82, the balance sheet is fortress-like. The company has demonstrated pricing power and operates with remarkable efficiency. But the valuation gives me pause. At $37.74, we're looking at an EV/EBITDA of 70.97x—nearly four times what Graham would consider reasonable even for a quality business. The Graham Number suggests intrinsic value around $9.07, implying a 76% margin of safety gap working against us. The Piotroski score of just 5/9 hints at deteriorating operational fundamentals despite strong recent earnings. An FCF yield of 0.2% is anemic for an investor seeking returns. What attracts me is Copart's secular tailwinds—increasing vehicle fleet size, rising insurance deductibles driving more salvage volume, and international expansion potential. Yet I cannot ignore that we're pricing in perfection. The stock has traded between $33.81 and $63.85 in 52 weeks, suggesting considerable volatility. My verdict: This is a wonderful business at an unreasonable price. I admire the management's execution, but until valuation becomes more sensible—a 40-50% pullback wouldn't surprise me—I remain on the sidelines. Quality alone doesn't justify paying 4x intrinsic value.
Bull Case
Copart's secular tailwinds—aging vehicle fleet, rising insurance deductibles, and vehicle complexity driving higher loss frequencies—could sustain mid-teens revenue growth for years. International expansion in underpenetrated markets like Continental Europe and the Middle East offers runway for 15-20% CAGR, justifying premium multiples for a best-in-class platform.
Bear Case
A recession reducing collision frequencies, insurance industry consolidation pressuring volume, or competitive disruption from traditional auction houses or new digital entrants could derail growth. At current valuation, even a modest slowdown to single-digit growth would justify a 30-40% repricing downward.
Data from SEC filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer