Century Enka (CENTENKA)
Asset PlayFairStock Score: 51/100 — MIXED
Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 1/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹569.15 |
| Market Cap | ₹1,243.63 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 8.45 |
| ROCE | 5.98% |
| ROE | 4.9% |
| Dividend Yield | 1.93% |
| Profit Growth | 299.41% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.01 |
| Sales Growth | 35.56% |
| Promoter Holding | 24.86% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹371.2 — ₹671.65 |
| Sector | Textiles & Apparels |
| Book Value | ₹684.58 |
Strengths
- Price-to-book of 0.67: buying ₹644.08 book value at ₹433.60
- Near-zero leverage: debt-to-equity of 0.03
- Piotroski F-score of 6/9 suggests financial soundness
- Dividend yield of 2.31% provides some compensation while waiting
Concerns
- Low business quality: ROE of 4.90% and ROCE of 5.98% are weak
- Top line contracting: sales growth of -16.57% and latest quarter sales at ₹412 Cr
- Profit growth of 85.63% conflicts with falling sales, making PEG 0.15 misleading
- Promoter holding of just 24.86% limits owner alignment
AI Analysis
At ₹433.60, Century Enka is the kind of stock Benjamin Graham would ask me to look at before I get excited: a ₹947 crore market cap against a book value of ₹644.08 per share, meaning I am buying assets at 67 paise to the rupee. The balance sheet supports the arithmetic: debt-to-equity is 0.03, virtually no debt, and the Piotroski score of 6/9 suggests no financial distress. But Graham also demanded earning power, and that is where I hesitate. Return on equity is 4.90% and ROCE is 5.98%—this is a business that generates barely half a decent return on the assets it claims to own. A discount to book value in a mediocre business can stay a discount for years. Sales growth is minus 16.57%, yet profit growth is reported at 85.63%. That mismatch tells me not to mistake a low-base recovery for a durable franchise. Last quarter's ₹24 crore net profit on ₹412 crore sales is only about a 5.8% net margin, and in a declining top line, that margin is fragile. The PEG of 0.15 is optically cheap, but a PEG calculated on a cyclical rebound is a trap, not a measurement. Promoter holding at just 24.86% is another red flag: I like the people running the business to have a meaningful, aligned stake. Still, with a dividend yield of 2.31% and no debt, shareholders are paid to wait. This is not a wonderful company; it is an asset-heavy textile player that may one day earn a better return if demand recovers. I see in it the characteristics of an asset play, not a compounder. I need to see sales stop falling and ROE move sustainably above the cost of capital before I can call it a value bargain.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer