Central Garden & Pet Company Class A Common Stock Nonvoting (CENTA)
StalwartFairStock Score: 51/100 — MIXED
Key Financials
| Current Price | $33.63 |
| Market Cap | $2.1B |
| P/E Ratio | 12.23 |
| ROE | 10.75% |
| Dividend Yield | —% |
| Sector | Consumer Defensive |
Strengths
- Generates $250 million in annual free cash flow (11.8% yield on market cap)
- Solid return on equity of 10.1% above cost of capital
Concerns
- Revenue declining at 6.0% year-over-year signals potential demand weakness or market share loss
- Altman Z-Score of 1.6 places it in the financial distress zone—elevated bankruptcy risk
AI Analysis
Central Garden & Pet Company Class A Common Stock Nonvoting is a small-cap consumer defensive company valued at $2.1 billion. The business generates $3.1 billion in annual revenue with a 0.2% net margin and $250 million in free cash flow. From a quality standpoint, Central shows distressed Altman Z-Score of 1.6 warrants caution and adequate 10% ROE. On valuation, the stock is attractively valued at 14.0x earnings, with a modest 9% margin of safety vs Graham Number. Growth dynamics show revenue growing at -6.0% and profit growth of -51.2%. Our composite FairStock Score of 51/100 reflects mixed fundamentals overall. Investors should weigh the business quality against the current price and their own margin of safety requirements.
Bull Case
Improving fundamentals and sector tailwinds could drive meaningful earnings growth, compressing the effective multiple for patient investors. With $250 million in annual free cash flow (11.8% yield), management has ample capital for buybacks, dividends, or accretive acquisitions.
Bear Case
Macro headwinds or sector-specific disruption could pressure margins, particularly if competitive intensity increases in the consumer defensive space. Regulatory changes, input cost inflation, or demand normalization represent underappreciated risks that could materially impact forward estimates.
Data from SEC filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer