Blackstone Inc. (BX)
StalwartFairStock Score: 64/100 — STEADY
Key Financials
| Current Price | $117.89 |
| Market Cap | $132.6B |
| P/E Ratio | 30.23 |
| ROE | 29.53% |
| Dividend Yield | 4.31% |
| Sector | Financial Services |
Strengths
- Exceptional ROE of 29.23% demonstrating superior capital deployment and competitive moat
- Diversified alternative assets platform reduces single-strategy dependency and provides recession resilience
- Recent quarter profitability of 27% net margin shows pricing power and operational leverage
- Market leadership position in private equity, real estate, and credit with $991B+ AUM
- Recurring fee income from managed assets provides predictable revenue base
Concerns
- Valuation is egregiously expensive at 28.53 P/E with negative 513% margin of safety versus Graham Number
- Weak Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 signals deteriorating underlying financial quality
- Anemic 0.8% FCF yield and missing FCF/revenue growth data obscure true cash generation capability
- High beta of 1.79 and 52-week range of $105-$190 indicates volatility and sentiment-driven pricing
AI Analysis
Blackstone presents a paradox that troubles me. On one hand, we see a formidable asset management franchise with exceptional returns on equity at 29.23% and a recent quarter displaying a healthy 27% net margin on $3.7B revenue. The $132.6B market capitalization reflects management's success in building an alternative assets powerhouse with diversified revenue streams across private equity, real estate, and credit. However, valuation demands scrutiny. At a P/E of 28.53 against my calculated Graham Number of just $17.99, we face a margin of safety of negative 513%—a massive red flag by Graham's standards. The stock trades at 9.98 times book value, suggesting the market prices in perpetual growth and near-perfect execution. I'm particularly concerned by the weak Piotroski F-Score of 5/9, indicating deteriorating financial quality metrics. The 0.8% FCF yield is anemic for a company of this caliber. While the business quality is genuinely superior—alternative asset management enjoys durable competitive advantages and sticky client relationships—I cannot justify paying this premium multiple. The 1.79 beta also suggests elevated volatility. Unless we see significant multiple compression or a dramatic acceleration in earnings growth, this represents a speculative wager rather than a value investment opportunity.
Bull Case
Blackstone's AUM growth trajectory and fee-rate expansion could justify premium multiples if alternative assets continue capturing institutional capital. A bull would argue the business quality and recurring revenue model warrant 25-30x earnings, particularly if margins expand further and credit/real estate segments accelerate.
Bear Case
Rising interest rates could compress valuations across private assets and real estate holdings. Economic slowdown would reduce fundraising and transaction volumes, while mean reversion toward historical asset management multiples (15-18x P/E) would devastate current shareholders caught at peak valuations.
Data from SEC filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer