Ashima (ASHIMASYN)
Asset PlayScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹17.13 |
| Market Cap | ₹328.31 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | 1.79% |
| ROE | -7.01% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 0% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.59 |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| Promoter Holding | 73.49% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹11.5 — ₹26 |
| Sector | Textiles & Apparels |
| Book Value | ₹14.45 |
Strengths
- Stock trades close to book value (P/B 1.03), offering asset-backing at a reasonable multiple
- Promoter holding is high at 73.49%, so key shareholders' interests are tied to the company
- Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 points to some balance-sheet stability signals despite weak earnings
- Debt/equity of 0.58 is not excessive, providing limited balance-sheet flexibility
Concerns
- Sales growth is -64.06% and latest quarterly sales are only ₹1 Cr with a net loss of ₹-3 Cr, indicating severe business stress
- Negative ROE of -7.01% and zero dividend mean no shareholder value is being generated
- P/E of 0.00 is meaningless; profit growth of 148.47% is likely from a low or negative base
- No evidence of a moat; commodity textile business lacks pricing power
AI Analysis
Let me start with a hard question: is this a business I can understand and trust? Ashima is a textile producer in a commodity industry, so I need clear evidence of cost advantage or pricing power. I do not see it. Sales have collapsed 64%, and the latest quarter shows just ₹1 crore of revenue and a ₹3 crore net loss. A company with ₹270 crore market cap and negative ROE of -7.01% is not compounding wealth; it is consuming it. ROCE of 1.79% is barely above zero, so the capital employed is not earning an acceptable return. The P/E is meaningless because earnings are not positive; P/B is 1.03, but Graham would not feel safe simply because the stock trades near book value. If those assets are loss-making and sales are drying up, book value can be impaired. Debt/equity is 0.58, not scary, but at this operating level even moderate debt becomes a squeeze. No dividend means I get no income while waiting. Profit growth of 148% sounds attractive until I look at the latest quarter's loss; this is a low-base mirage. The Piotroski F-score of 6/9 is mildly encouraging, and promoter holding at 73.49% aligns owners with shareholders, but high promoter holding does not create a moat. The FairStock Score is unavailable due to insufficient data, which itself tells me to be careful. The 52-week range of ₹11.50 to ₹27.80 shows a speculative, volatile situation. I need many quarters of rising sales and positive profits before I can believe in a genuine turnaround. Right now, this is not a wonderful business at a fair price; it is an asset play with real risk that the assets are worth less than stated.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer