Anjani Portland (APCL)

Asset Play

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹103.55
Market Cap₹304.18 Cr
P/E Ratio0
ROCE-9.07%
ROE-26.14%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth-238.66%
Debt/Equity0.62
Sales Growth-63.08%
Promoter Holding75%
52-Week Range₹98 — ₹148.78
SectorCement & Cement Products
Book Value₹124.4

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

This is not the kind of company Buffett would normally buy. Anjani Portland is a small cement player trading at ₹113, below book value of ₹135.03 — a P/B of 0.84. As a Graham-style investor, that initially gets my attention: the market is giving me a discount to net assets. But the discount is only useful if the assets are not evaporating. Right now, they are. In the latest quarter, sales were ₹80 crore and the net loss was ₹20 crore. That is a 25% net loss margin. The full picture is just as bad: ROE is -26.14% and ROCE is -9.07%. Sales are down 23.93% from the prior year. With debt/equity at 2.23, this company has high borrowings in a capital-intensive industry. No dividend means the investor gets no income while waiting for a recovery. The reported profit growth of 4.82% is meaningless next to a quarterly loss; perhaps it is a backward-looking figure, but I cannot rely on it. The one genuinely positive fact is promoter holding of 75% — the owners have skin in the game. The Piotroski F-score of 5/9 is mediocre, not terrible. So this is not a stalwart, nor a fast grower. It is an asset play with turnaround characteristics, but only if the cement cycle and company operations improve before losses eat the book value. The 52-week range of ₹98–₹152 tells me the stock is already beaten down. Graham would say: do not mistake a cheap multiple for a margin of safety. I would need to see quarterly losses shrink, debt fall, and positive operating cash flow before acting. The book value is the cushion; the losses are the knife.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer