Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK)
Fast GrowerFairStock Score: 60/100 — STEADY
Key Financials
| Current Price | $236.62 |
| Market Cap | $55.3B |
| P/E Ratio | 34.54 |
| ROE | 50.4% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Sector | Technology |
Strengths
- Fortress moat: Industry-standard software deeply embedded in professional workflows with high switching costs
- Exceptional profitability: 39.67% ROE and 16.15% net margins demonstrate pricing power and operational leverage
- Recurring revenue model: Subscription-based business provides predictable, sticky revenue streams
- Strong free cash flow generation: $2.8B FCF provides financial flexibility and demonstrates real earnings quality
- Solid financial foundation: Altman Z-Score of 3.58 and Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicate financial stability
Concerns
- Extreme overvaluation: Trading at 12x Graham Number with negative 1,089% margin of safety—no reasonable investor should pay this
- Poor ROCE relative to valuation: 9.70% ROCE insufficient to justify 96x EV/EBITDA multiple
- Excessive leverage: D/E ratio of 0.90 combined with high valuation creates significant downside risk
- Anemic FCF yield: 1.8% free cash flow yield provides minimal margin of safety for equity investors
AI Analysis
Autodesk presents a classic case of a quality business trading at a speculative price. The company commands genuine competitive advantages—its design software suite is deeply embedded in workflows across architecture, engineering, and construction. The 39.67% ROE demonstrates real pricing power and operational excellence. Their transition to subscription models has created recurring revenue streams, evidenced by $2.0B quarterly revenue and strong 16.15% net margins. However, I find myself deeply uncomfortable with the valuation. At $260.99 with a Graham Number of just $21.94, we're looking at a margin of safety of negative 1,089%—essentially paying 12 times what fundamental analysis suggests the company is worth. The EV/EBITDA of 96x is frankly absurd for any business, regardless of quality. While the Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests reasonable financial health, and the Altman Z-Score of 3.58 indicates stability, the price has detached from reality. The FCF yield of 1.8% is meager for this price. Yes, they have $2.8B in free cash flow, but that's generating minimal returns for shareholders at current valuations. I'm watching a genuinely good business, but as Graham would say, price is what you pay, value is what you get. Here, we're paying far too much for what we're getting.
Bull Case
Autodesk's AI-enhanced design tools and cloud infrastructure position it as a essential platform for the digital transformation of architecture, engineering, and construction. With expanding TAM across geographies and growing adoption in emerging markets, coupled with operating leverage from their SaaS model, the company could justify premium valuations if execution remains flawless.
Bear Case
Macro slowdown in construction and real estate could compress margins and growth. If competition intensifies or AI disruption commoditizes design software, the valuation multiple compresses dramatically, causing significant shareholder losses from current levels.
Data from SEC filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer