ABS Marine (ABSMARINE)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 60/100 — STEADY

Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹329
Market Cap₹807.7 Cr
P/E Ratio8.23
ROCE14.2%
ROE—%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth291.78%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth69.94%
Promoter Holding63.96%
52-Week Range₹143.05 — ₹347.75
SectorTransport Services

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

I approach ABS Marine with caution, not excitement. A P/E of 8.23 on a ₹413 crore market cap looks cheap, but in shipping, low multiples often accompany peak earnings, not bargains. Sales jumped 69.94% and profit grew 291.78%; the latest quarter showed ₹136 crore sales and ₹31 crore net profit — a nearly 23% net margin. That is an extraordinary margin for a shipping business. Graham taught me to be suspicious of extraordinary profits; they attract capacity and revert. The 52-week range of ₹143.05 to ₹314.80 tells me this is a volatile cyclical ship, not a steady compounder. ROCE is 14.20%, acceptable but not the hallmark of a wide-moat franchise. The Piotroski score of 7/9 and 63.96% promoter holding are positives — they suggest no immediate financial distress and promoter alignment. But with zero dividend, the shareholder is entirely dependent on future growth. I cannot compute a real margin of safety because book value, debt/equity and ROE are all unavailable. Without knowing leverage, I cannot sleep well owning a shipping stock at any multiple. The PEG ratio of 0.05 is almost meaningless in a cyclical; it merely reflects one year's explosive growth. If freight rates soften, earnings can fall as fast as they rose. This may be a trading vehicle, but it is not a Buffett-style investment. I would put it in the 'too hard' pile unless management proves consistent returns across a full shipping cycle and opens the balance sheet. Price is down from ₹314.80, but a falling knife in a cyclical is not automatically value.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer