Aarti Industries (AARTIIND)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 52/100 — MIXED

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹534.1
Market Cap₹19,373.23 Cr
P/E Ratio36.51
ROCE6.32%
ROE6.74%
Dividend Yield0.19%
Profit Growth230.83%
Debt/Equity0.83
Sales Growth36.76%
Free Cash Flow₹-156 Cr
Promoter Holding42.14%
52-Week Range₹338.05 — ₹551.45
SectorChemicals & Petrochemicals
Book Value₹164.74

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At ₹465.85, Aarti Industries is not a value investment; it is a hope investment. The price-to-earnings ratio of 43.70 and price-to-book of 3.01 require flawless execution, yet the business is earning just 6.74% on equity and 6.32% on capital. Graham would say the margin of safety is missing, and the mathematics agree: the Graham Number is ₹190.47, while the price is ₹465.85. That leaves a deeply negative margin of safety, and the reported EV/EBITDA of 239x only reinforces the red flag. I do see some strengths. Revenue grew 13.35%, and the 5-year CAGR of 10.04% shows the company is serving real demand. A Piotroski score of 8/9 suggests financial discipline, and debt/equity of 0.70 is not alarming. Promoter holding of 42.14% aligns interests. But the economics need to improve before I am interested. Sales are growing much faster than profit: profit growth is only 3.00%. The latest quarter's net profit of ₹133 Cr against sales of ₹2,318 Cr is a thin margin. Free cash flow is negative ₹156 Cr, so reported earnings are not reaching the bank. Return on equity and return on capital below 7% are not signs of a durable moat; they are signs of pricing pressure or a cyclical trough. At a market cap of ₹16,213 Cr, the stock is paying for a future that has not arrived. The Altman Z-score of 2.42 reminds me to be cautious. I would wait for expanding margins, positive free cash flow, and a price closer to a conservatively estimated value. In the meantime, I pass.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer