NAPS Global (544373)
Fast GrowerScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹44 |
| Market Cap | ₹19.49 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 7.33 |
| ROCE | 23.81% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 122.81% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 135.77% |
| Sector | Textiles & Apparels |
Strengths
- Exceptional top-line growth of 135.77% and profit growth of 122.81%
- Attractive valuation with P/E of 7.33 and PEG of 0.06
- Strong ROCE of 23.81% indicating efficient capital use
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests solid financial health
- Latest quarter sales of ₹68 Cr versus ₹19 Cr market cap shows low revenue multiple
Concerns
- Razor-thin net margin of ~1.5% in the latest quarter raises profitability sustainability questions
- No dividend yield, so shareholder returns depend entirely on growth and capital appreciation
- Insufficient data on promoter holding, debt, and book value limits forensic confidence
- Textile products industry is highly competitive with limited moat potential
AI Analysis
At first glance, NAPS Global presents the kind of numbers that catch any value investor's eye. A P/E of 7.33 with sales growth of 135.77% and profit growth of 122.81% seems almost too good. With a market cap of just ₹19 Cr and a latest quarter revenue of ₹68 Cr, the company is trading at a fraction of its annualized sales. The Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 suggests a reasonably healthy balance sheet, and an ROCE of 23.81% indicates efficient capital deployment. The PEG ratio of 0.06 is extraordinary, but I have learned to be suspicious of extremes. Growth at this pace from a small base often reflects a low base effect, and the latest quarter's net profit of ₹1 Cr on sales of ₹68 Cr translates to a razor-thin margin of under 1.5%. That is a red flag for sustainability and pricing power. In the textile products industry, moats are rare and competition is fierce. Without data on promoter holding, debt, or book value, I am flying partly blind. The absence of a dividend is acceptable for a fast grower, but it means the return to shareholders must come entirely from growth and eventual earnings quality. I would not buy this solely on the trailing numbers. I would demand evidence that margins can expand, that growth is not just a one-off order flow, and that the balance sheet is truly as clean as the F-Score suggests. For now, this is a fast grower on paper, but patience and further information are required before I commit capital.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer