Technichem Org. (544327)

Cyclical

Score breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹45
Market Cap₹77.95 Cr
P/E Ratio25.06
ROCE13.82%
ROE—%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth-42.59%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth5.73%
SectorChemicals & Petrochemicals

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At ₹45, Technichem Org. wears a market cap of only ₹78 crore. That's small, and in small companies I demand even more visible evidence of quality. What do I see? Sales grew 5.73%, but profits collapsed by 42.59%. The latest quarter still earned only ₹1 crore on ₹28 crore of sales—a thin margin. A 25.06 P/E on falling earnings is not Benjamin Graham's idea of a bargain; the PEG of 4.37 confirms that growth doesn't justify the price. ROCE of 13.82% is decent, but with book value, debt-to-equity, and promoter holding unavailable, I cannot judge balance-sheet safety or alignment. The Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 points to weak financial health. There is no dividend, so the only return is from future earnings growth—and that growth is currently going backwards. In my circle of competence, I want consistency, identifiable moats, and margin of safety. This has none of those in convincing form. Even the advanced indicators do not comfort me: a Piotroski score of 4 out of 9 means the firm fails several basic quality tests, and the 13.82% ROCE, while respectable, is not an exceptional moat. At this price, the stock is being valued at 25 times trailing earnings, while the latest quarter's profit of ₹1 crore is too small to celebrate. Without book value or debt details, I cannot calculate downside protection. Graham always insisted on a margin of safety; reading these numbers, I find no margin—only hope. I will leave this in the 'too hard' pile until the business posts several consistent quarters and the balance sheet is made visible.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer