PropsharePlatina (544295)
Fast GrowerScore breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 1/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹10,55,100 |
| Market Cap | ₹354.62 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 14.92 |
| ROCE | 0% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 6.51% |
| Profit Growth | 1,000% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 261.97% |
Strengths
- P/E of 14.92 is not demanding on reported earnings
- Dividend yield of 6.51% provides a tangible cash return
- Sales growth of 261.97% and profit growth of 1000% show strong momentum
- Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 indicates a reasonably sound financial position
Concerns
- Latest quarter net profit of ₹14 Cr exceeds sales of ₹8 Cr, raising serious doubts about earnings quality
- ROCE of 0.00% and missing ROE/book value make it impossible to assess capital efficiency
- Extremely high growth rates are likely due to a low base and are not necessarily repeatable
- No promoter holding, industry, or moat data leaves the business quality unverifiable
AI Analysis
At first glance, this looks like a dream: 262% sales growth, 1000% profit growth, a P/E of 14.92, and a 6.51% dividend yield. But as Graham taught, the figures must be read with suspicion, not excitement. The latest quarter shows sales of just ₹8 Cr but a net profit of ₹14 Cr. Profit exceeding revenue is a serious red flag. It suggests the earnings may not come from the operating business at all—possibly one-off gains, tax credits, or non-operating items. A true compounding machine must earn its profits from its products and customers, not from line items that won't recur. ROCE is 0.00%, which is impossible to reconcile with a healthy operating business, and with no book value, ROE, or debt-equity data, I cannot judge capital allocation or financial leverage. The PEG of 0.02 is a mathematical mirage when growth is coming off a tiny base; 1000% profit growth sounds spectacular, but percentage change from small numbers is meaningless for valuation. The Piotroski score of 6 is okay, but that is a snapshot for accounting health, not a moat. I also know nothing about promoter holding, the industry, or the competitive position. Without those, this is not an investment; it is a speculation. A 6.51% dividend is attractive only if it is backed by free cash flow, not by one-off earnings. I would need several years of normalized profit, cash flow statements, and proof of a durable advantage before trusting this business. Mr. Market is offering a story I cannot verify. I will pass until the numbers speak clearly.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer