Gujarat Hy-Spin (540938)
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹12.85 |
| Market Cap | ₹21.52 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 188 |
| ROCE | 4.09% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 0% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -19.35% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹6.19 — ₹19.24 |
| Sector | Textiles & Apparels |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
Look at the numbers and I see a business I'd rather watch than own. Market cap ₹22 crore with a P/E of 188. That is not value; it is a tiny denominator. Sales latest quarter ₹37 crore, but sales declined 19.35%. Annualizing that quarterly figure gives roughly ₹148 crore in revenue, so the market prices this company at a fraction of sales. But a low price-to-sales is not a margin of safety. A company that cannot turn meaningful revenue into profit is a wealth destroyer, not a compounder. Return on capital employed is just 4.09%, far below what a textile business must earn to justify its capital. The Piotroski F-Score is 3/9, a poor sign. Latest quarter net profit is near zero or a small loss. There is no dividend, and promoter holding, book value, and debt-equity are not disclosed, so I cannot even assess financial strength. In Graham's language, this is a speculative issue: a low price but no evidence of durable earning power. Textiles are cyclical and intensely competitive. There is no moat, no pricing power, and no brand strength. The 52-week range of ₹6.19 to ₹27.00 shows extreme volatility driven by sentiment, not fundamentals. I require a margin of safety from earnings and assets, not just from a small market cap. Unless the company can stabilize sales, push ROCE meaningfully higher, and demonstrate real profitability, I would pass. The only possible case here is a turnaround, but I see no evidence to bank on one.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer