Auto Pins (I) (531994)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹162.1 |
| Market Cap | ₹97.38 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 242.84 |
| ROCE | 8.78% |
| ROE | 4.5% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 216.67% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -1.58% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹108.8 — ₹270.1 |
| Sector | Auto Components |
| Book Value | ₹15.41 |
Strengths
- Profit growth of 216.67% indicates earnings are recovering from a very low base.
- Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests some improvement in fundamentals, not just price action.
- Small market cap of ₹97 Cr gives potential room to scale up if the auto cycle turns decisively in its favour.
- Listed on NSE/BSE with trading range liquidity offers easy entry/exit for smaller investors.
Concerns
- P/E of 242.84 and P/B of 10.52 against book value of ₹15.41 and ROE of 4.50% signal severe overvaluation.
- Latest quarter net profit is ₹0 Cr on ₹9 Cr sales, meaning current profitability is negligible.
- Sales growth is negative at -1.58%, so the top line is shrinking while the stock is priced for perfection.
- Zero dividend yield gives no income support to shareholders while waiting for a turnaround.
AI Analysis
At ₹162.10, Auto Pins commands a ₹97 crore market cap, but the market is paying 242 times trailing earnings. That is not investing; that is speculation unless extraordinary growth is visible. The company's own numbers do not support such enthusiasm. Sales actually shrank 1.58% in the latest full year, and the most recent quarter shows net profit of just ₹0 crore on ₹9 crore sales. So the 216.67% profit growth is from a minuscule base, not a durable economic engine. Graham would ask for margin of safety: book value is ₹15.41, so the stock trades at 10.52 times book while earning only 4.50% on equity. ROCE of 8.78% is mediocre and does not justify such a premium. The P/B-to-ROE gap is a clear warning. There is no dividend yield, so investors get no compensation while waiting. The Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 shows some fundamental improvement, but it is not enough. Where is the moat? Auto components can be competitive, with pricing power limited by automaker customers; I see no evidence here of a wide, durable economic franchise. The PEG of 1.12 is meaningless when near-zero earnings make the P/E unreliable. The 52-week range of ₹108.80 to ₹270.10 reflects a speculative small-cap, not a steady compounding machine. I would demand a much lower price, higher return on equity, and evidence of sales growth before considering this. In Buffett's words, it's far better to buy a wonderful business at a fair price than a fair business at a wonderful price—and this is not a wonderful business at any price.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer