Chart.Logistics (531977)

Turnaround

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹9.87
Market Cap₹103.24 Cr
P/E Ratio482.47
ROCE5.76%
ROE4.04%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth-241.89%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth-14.13%
52-Week Range₹4.8 — ₹9.95
SectorTransport Services
Book Value₹4.22

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

When I look at Chart.Logistics, I first ask whether the business has good economics and a durable advantage. Logistics in India is a hard, competitive, low-margin business, and the numbers here do not show any moat. Sales are down 14.13%, and profit growth has collapsed by 241.89%. The latest quarter has ₹17 crore of revenue and a ₹1 crore net loss. That is not compounding; that is a business moving in the wrong direction. The balance sheet gives no comfort at this price. Book value is ₹4.22 per share, but the market wants ₹9.87—2.34 times book. For that premium, I expect a wonderful business. Instead, ROE is 4.04% and ROCE is 5.76%. Those are poor returns on capital; I am not willing to pay a high multiple for mediocrity. There is no dividend yield, so I receive nothing while I wait. The Piotroski score is 3/9, which is a red flag on financial health. What about valuation? A P/E of 482.47 is not a sign of exciting growth; it is a warning. The trailing earnings are tiny, and with profit growth at -241.89% and a loss in the latest quarter, even that small earnings base is cracking. At ₹9.87, the stock sits near its 52-week high of ₹10.00, while fundamentals have deteriorated. That is Mr. Market's optimism, not Graham's margin of safety. Could this be a turnaround? Yes, but a turnaround is not an investment thesis unless proven by numbers. I need to see sales stabilise, profits return, and ROE/ROCE climb toward respectable levels. Until then, paying 2.34 times book for a 4% ROE is speculation. I prefer arithmetic. This is not a quality compounder and not a bargain. I will wait on the sidelines.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer