Padam Cotton (531395)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 1/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹49.63 |
| Market Cap | ₹19.22 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 5.97 |
| ROCE | 24.23% |
| ROE | 86.5% |
| Dividend Yield | 5.39% |
| Profit Growth | -54.31% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 1,537.84% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹0.89 — ₹49.63 |
| Sector | Textiles & Apparels |
| Book Value | ₹0.85 |
Strengths
- Low apparent valuation: P/E of 5.97 and dividend yield of 5.39%.
- High reported capital efficiency: ROE 86.50% and ROCE 24.23%.
- Latest quarter shows traction: ₹18 Cr sales and ₹2 Cr net profit against a ₹19 Cr market cap.
- Sales growth of 1,537.84% shows revenue expansion from a tiny base.
Concerns
- P/B of 58.39 and book value of ₹0.85 leave no Graham-style asset margin of safety.
- Profit growth of -54.31% despite 1,537.84% sales growth suggests weak margins or one-off revenue.
- Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and PEG of 0.00 are not signs of reliable financial quality.
- 52-week range of ₹0.89–₹49.63 and insufficient data with promoter holding not available indicate speculative risk.
AI Analysis
Let me be blunt: Padam Cotton fails my two basic tests. First, can I understand the business? A ₹19 crore textile micro-cap with no promoter data and a FairStock score of 'insufficient data' is not an understandable compounding machine. Second, does the price stand well below intrinsic value? A P/B of 58.39 against a book value of ₹0.85 is not Graham's kind of bargain, whatever the P/E of 5.97 whispers. The 1,537.84% sales growth is a loud headline, but profit growth is down 54.31%. That tells me revenue may be low-quality or one-time. The latest quarter shows ₹18 crore sales and ₹2 crore profit, which is positive, but a single quarter is not an economic franchise. ROE of 86.50% and ROCE of 24.23% look extraordinary only because the equity base is tiny; arithmetic on a microscopic book value can be misleading. A Piotroski F-score of 4/9 reinforces my caution. The 5.39% dividend yield is attractive, but I need cash-flow evidence before trusting it. The 52-week range of ₹0.89 to ₹49.63 is the most revealing figure: this stock has been a speculative phenomenon, not a steady business. This could be a genuine turnaround, and a small investor may make money, but that is speculation, not valuation. I have learned that predicting the near term is impossible; I need margin of safety. With book value under ₹1, profits volatile, and data insufficient, there is no margin of safety. I would wait, demand several quarters of consistent earning power, audited balance-sheet clarity, and promoter transparency, and only then consider a position.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer