Centenial Surgic (531380)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹110.9 |
| Market Cap | ₹40.52 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | 3.94% |
| ROE | -3.33% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 117.65% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 21.8% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹76.27 — ₹124.9 |
| Sector | Healthcare Equipment & Supplies |
| Book Value | ₹87.16 |
Strengths
- Sales growth of 21.80% shows topline momentum; latest quarter revenue of ₹15 Cr is meaningful relative to the ₹41 Cr market cap.
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests improving financial health and balance-sheet discipline.
- ROCE is positive at 3.94%, so operations are not outright destroying capital.
- Book value of ₹87.16 and P/B of 1.27 provide some asset backing, though the premium needs future earnings to justify it.
Concerns
- Latest quarter net profit is ₹0 Cr and P/E is 0.00, so there is no current earnings support for the price.
- ROE is negative at -3.33%, meaning shareholders' equity is not being rewarded.
- Zero dividend yield means investors receive no cash income while waiting for a turnaround.
- Promoter holding and debt/equity data are unavailable, leaving a dangerous information gap for a microcap.
AI Analysis
At ₹110.90, Centenial Surgic is a ₹41 crore microcap in medical equipment. I like that industry, but I buy companies, not tickers. The numbers tell me this is not yet a compounding machine. Sales grew 21.80%, and the latest quarter brought ₹15 crore of revenue, yet net profit was exactly ₹0 crore. That explains the P/E of 0.00. A reported profit growth of 117.65% excites only if the base is meaningful; here, it is not. The book value stands at ₹87.16, so at ₹110.90 I am paying a 1.27 times book premium for a business whose ROE is negative at -3.33%. That is a poor trade-off. ROCE of 3.94% tells me the company earns a modest return on capital employed, but not enough to call it a wonderful operation. There is no dividend, and promoter holding and debt/equity details are unavailable—so I am flying blind on ownership and leverage. The one genuinely encouraging signal is the Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, which suggests improving fundamentals and a more solid balance sheet than the zero profit alone would imply. But a good F-Score is not a moat. The stock swung from ₹76.27 to ₹189.00 in the last year; that is Mr. Market's mood swings, not intrinsic value. Graham would ask for a margin of safety and a demonstrated ability to earn. I cannot find that in a quarter with no earnings. If this company can convert its growing sales into real profit, it could become a turnaround. Until then, I would rather wait than pay for promise.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer