Tusaldah (531301)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹63 |
| Market Cap | ₹4.29 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | -5.97% |
| ROE | 31.66% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -500% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹100.5 — ₹248.95 |
| Sector | Textiles & Apparels |
Strengths
- Market cap of ₹4 Cr is tiny, so any genuine asset sale, restructuring, or reverse merger could have an outsized effect.
- Current price of ₹63 is far below the ₹100.50–₹249.90 52-week range, meaning sentiment and expectations are already very low.
- The reported ROE of 31.66%, if it refers to a positive prior year, at least shows how small the equity base is—so a modest profit could move the ratio sharply.
Concerns
- Latest quarter sales are ₹0 Cr and net profit is ₹-0 Cr; there is no operating earnings engine.
- Profit growth of -500%, ROCE of -5.97%, and Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 point to severe financial and operational stress.
- Book value, debt/equity, and promoter holding are all N/A, so balance-sheet safety and insider commitment cannot be assessed.
- Zero dividend and a price below the 52-week low suggest a possible value trap rather than a bargain.
AI Analysis
Let me start with the obvious: Tusaldah fails every test I care about. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹0 crore and a net profit of ₹-0 crore. That is not a business; it is a shell. Profit growth of -500% and ROCE of -5.97% tell me operations are destroying value, not creating it. The Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 is a serious red flag—it is a poor score on profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency. People may look at the ₹63 price versus the 52-week range of ₹100.50 to ₹249.90 and think it is cheaper. I think the opposite: when a company has no revenue, a falling price does not create a margin of safety. It simply reflects fewer people wanting to own a dead business. A reported ROE of 31.66% looks attractive at first, but with zero sales and a loss in the latest quarter, that number is either stale, distorted, or based on a tiny and possibly negative book value. And I cannot check book value, debt, or promoter holding because they are not disclosed. In Graham's framework, you cannot value what you cannot measure. With no earnings, no assets shown, no dividend, and no growth, the mathematical value is, at best, indeterminate. At ₹4 crore market cap, the only hope is that there is some hidden asset, a clean balance sheet, or a corporate action. That is speculation, not investment. I would not take a position without audited numbers and a clear path to earning positive returns. 'If you have to ask whether it's a bargain, it probably isn't.' This one goes into the 'too hard' pile until better evidence arrives.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer