Amit Internation (531300)

Asset Play

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹3.94
Market Cap₹7.84 Cr
P/E Ratio52.58
ROCE0.81%
ROE0.6%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth-100%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth0%
52-Week Range₹3.01 — ₹4.76
SectorTextiles & Apparels
Book Value₹10.41

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

This is exactly the kind of stock Benjamin Graham would tell me to examine, but also exactly the kind that can trap a value investor. Amit Internation trades at ₹3.94, while book value stands at ₹10.41. That is a P/B of 0.38, so the market is assigning only 38 paise for every rupee of stated net worth. On the surface, this seems to be a deep value, asset play opportunity. But a low price to book is only the starting point, not the conclusion. The business earns almost nothing. ROE is just 0.60% and ROCE is 0.81%. Latest quarter sales are ₹0 crore and net profit is ₹0 crore; profit growth is -100%, and sales growth is 0.00%. There is no engine driving value. A company that cannot earn a decent return on assets is merely holding capital. With a Piotroski F-Score of 3/9, the fundamental health looks weak. It also gives no dividend, so I receive nothing while waiting for the market to recognize value. The P/E of 52.58 is a warning sign—when earnings are near zero, the ratio loses meaning. Promoter holding is not available, debt/equity is not available, and the FairStock Score says insufficient data. I cannot build confidence without those numbers. If the book assets are real and can be sold or put to better use, the stock could be a rewarding asset play. But if the assets are stale, overstated, or stuck in a non-operating shell, the apparent margin of safety evaporates. Graham taught me to buy only when facts give protection. Here, facts are too thin. I will watch for concrete signs of asset monetization or a fundamental turnaround, but I will not rely on hope.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer