Marble City (531281)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹27.09 |
| Market Cap | ₹62.04 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 26.5 |
| ROCE | 0% |
| ROE | 20.3% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 0% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹86.15 — ₹174.5 |
| Sector | Other Construction Materials |
| Book Value | ₹20.69 |
Strengths
- Latest quarter net profit of ₹2 crore on ₹18 crore sales implies roughly 11% net margin.
- Return on equity of 20.30% suggests existing equity is generating a decent profit.
- Book value of ₹20.69 gives some per-share asset backing, and P/B of 1.31 is not an extreme valuation.
Concerns
- Zero sales growth, zero profit growth, and no dividend make the 26.50 P/E difficult to justify.
- Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 indicates poor financial health and possible operational stress.
- ROCE of 0.00% signals weak return on capital employed despite the positive ROE.
- Current price of ₹27.09 sits far below the stated 52-week range of ₹86.15–₹187.80, creating serious data or corporate-event doubts.
AI Analysis
Looking at Marble City, I ask whether this business has a moat and a sound financial foundation. The data does not give me that comfort. The company is a ₹62 crore construction-materials player, but it is not growing: sales growth and profit growth both sit at 0.00%, and there is no dividend. The latest quarter shows ₹18 crore in sales and ₹2 crore net profit, an 11% margin, but a single quarter is not evidence of a durable turnaround. At ₹27.09, the P/E is 26.50; paying 26.5 times stagnant earnings is not a Graham-style margin of safety. The P/B of 1.31 against book value of ₹20.69 offers some asset backing, and the 20.30% ROE looks respectable on the surface. But ROCE of 0.00% and a Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 tell a different story: poor capital efficiency and weak fundamental trends. The current price is far below the stated 52-week range of ₹86.15 to ₹187.80. That is either a data error or a serious adverse event, and both are red flags. Promoter holding and debt details are unavailable, so I cannot judge who is running it or how leveraged it is. In Ben Graham's terms, the margin of safety must be measurable, not just a fallen price. Without consistent earnings, a clean balance sheet, or believable data, this remains a speculation. I will stay on the sidelines unless concrete turnaround evidence appears.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer