India Gelatine (531253)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹379.9 |
| Market Cap | ₹272.19 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 8.67 |
| ROCE | 11.87% |
| ROE | 16.32% |
| Dividend Yield | 1.55% |
| Profit Growth | 99.44% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -14.71% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹295 — ₹418 |
| Sector | Chemicals & Petrochemicals |
| Book Value | ₹213.15 |
Strengths
- Low P/E of 8.67 and P/B of 1.78 provide a margin of safety if earnings hold.
- ROE of 16.32% indicates reasonable shareholder return generation.
- Latest quarter net profit of ₹7 Cr on sales of ₹45 Cr shows margin expansion.
- Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 points to broadly sound financials.
- Book value of ₹213.15 per share offers a tangible asset cushion.
Concerns
- Sales declined 14.71%, showing weak demand or pricing pressure.
- ROCE of 11.87% is modest, implying the business is fairly capital intensive.
- The 99.44% profit growth is likely a low-base effect and may not be repeatable.
- Promoter holding and debt details are missing, limiting full assessment.
AI Analysis
At ₹379.90 with a market cap of ₹272 Cr, India Gelatine is being offered to me at 8.67 times earnings and 1.78 times book value. That looks cheap, but I have learned that cheap can be a trap if the business quality is poor. This is a specialty chemical maker with a niche product, gelatine. I don't see a powerful consumer brand or a pricing moat; the edge is likely in manufacturing relationships and process knowledge. A 16.32% ROE is respectable, yet an ROCE of 11.87% tells me the business needs capital to generate returns. The book value of ₹213.15 provides some support, but the price is still a meaningful premium to that. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹45 Cr and net profit of ₹7 Cr, which supports the low earnings multiple on an annualised basis. However, I am bothered by the 14.71% decline in sales. A profit jump of 99.44% looks impressive, but when the top line is shrinking, I suspect a low base, cost cuts, or input-cost tailwinds rather than durable demand. The PEG of 0.09 is built on that profit spike; I cannot trust it. A 1.55% dividend yield is modest, and the Piotroski score of 6 suggests acceptable but not exceptional financial health. Graham would say price is what you pay, value is what you get. Here I get a small-cap cyclical with decent returns but no wide moat and a weak sales trend. I would need the revenue to stabilise and grow before treating this as a compounding machine. Until then, this is a possible value situation, not a certainty.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer