Sainik Finance (530265)
Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹44.15 |
| Market Cap | ₹49.12 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 7.21 |
| ROCE | 11.76% |
| ROE | 13.89% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -11.43% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 12.21% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹27.05 — ₹48 |
| Sector | Cement & Cement Products |
| Book Value | ₹39.86 |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
At ₹44.15, Sainik Finance is a tiny ₹49 crore-cap cement-related business. My first rule is to understand what I own; here the numbers do not make me comfortable. The stock trades at 7.21 times trailing earnings and 1.11 times book, so on a Graham basis it is not expensive. Book value is ₹39.86, so the market price is only about 10% above book. Return on equity is 13.89% and ROCE 11.76%, which are respectable but hardly evidence of a wide moat. Sales grew 12.21%, yet profit fell 11.43%. That is a red flag: either margins are being squeezed or costs are rising. The latest quarter, ₹4 crore sales and ₹1 crore profit, is too short a period to judge. A Piotroski F-Score of 4 out of 9 reinforces my suspicion that financial health is weak. The stated PEG of 0.59 is meaningless when reported profit is declining. There is no dividend—0.00% yield—so the return depends entirely on price, and I cannot verify governance because promoter holding and debt-to-equity are not disclosed. Cement is a cyclical, commodity-like business. This small player likely has no pricing power. The low P/E might look like a Graham bargain, but falling profit and a low F-Score warn against a value trap. I need evidence of stable margins, better disclosure, and improving earnings before I would commit. At best, this is a cyclical candidate for the watch list, not a buy today.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer