Midwest Gold (526570)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹42.5 |
| Market Cap | ₹13.9 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | 0% |
| ROE | -2.1% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 0% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹1,824.05 — ₹5,900 |
| Sector | Other Construction Materials |
Strengths
- Quarterly sales of ₹1 crore indicate the company still has some operating revenue, so it is not a completely dormant shell.
- With a market cap of only ₹14 crore, a successful business revival, asset sale, or restructuring could produce a large percentage upside.
- No dividend is being paid, so any future cash flow, if restored, could be retained inside the business for turnaround efforts.
Concerns
- Quarterly loss of ₹3 crore against sales of ₹1 crore means cash burn is severe and likely unsustainable.
- Piotroski F-score of 2/9 signals very weak financial health and deteriorating fundamentals.
- Critical data is missing: book value, debt/equity, promoter holding, and a credible P/E; intrinsic value cannot be estimated.
- The 52-week range of ₹1,735.15-₹5,900.00 is inconsistent with the current price of ₹42.50, raising serious data and market credibility questions.
AI Analysis
Looking at Midwest Gold, the first thing I ask is: can I understand the business and does it earn a decent return? The answer is no. Quarterly sales are a mere ₹1 crore and the company lost ₹3 crore in that quarter. That is a business burning more cash than it brings in. Return on equity is -2.10%, ROCE is zero, and the Piotroski F-score is 2 out of 9 — evidence of poor financial health. There is no dividend, no growth, and no meaningful P/E because profits are absent. With a market cap of ₹14 crore, this is a microcap, which means any investment is a tiny footnote without liquidity or safety. I cannot ignore the 52-week range: ₹1,735.15 to ₹5,900.00 against a current price of ₹42.50. That inconsistency suggests price distortions, corporate actions, or unreliable data. Benjamin Graham taught us to demand reliable numbers; here even book value, debt/equity and promoter holding are unavailable. I cannot compute a margin of safety when I don't know the assets. A F-score of 2/9 implies deteriorating fundamentals, not a cheap bargain. This is not a moat business; it's a construction materials company with no pricing power, no earnings power, and no identifiable competitive advantage. If someone acquires the shares at this price, they are betting on a turnaround. But there is no evidence of a turnaround in these figures. As Buffett, I would rather wait for a quality company at a fair price than buy an opaque, loss-making microcap at any price. In the end, Midwest Gold fails my first test: 'Don't lose money.' I can't evaluate it, so I pass.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer