Jattashankar Ind (514318)

Asset Play

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹38
Market Cap₹17.37 Cr
P/E Ratio1,000
ROCE-6.93%
ROE0.75%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth381.82%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth2,79,600%
52-Week Range₹201.2 — ₹454.1
SectorTextiles & Apparels
Book Value₹43.56

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let me start with what I see: Jattashankar Ind is a tiny textile enterprise, market cap ₹17 Cr, selling at ₹38 against book value ₹43.56. That sounds like an asset play, but I must not let the cheap P/B blind me. The company earns almost nothing — ROE is 0.75%, ROCE is -6.93%, and latest quarterly net profit is ₹0 Cr. A P/E of 1000 reinforces the truth: on earnings, it is not cheap at all. Sales growth of 279,600% and profit growth of 381.82% may look spectacular, but from a negligible base they are statistical illusions, not evidence of a durable franchise. In a commodity-like textile industry, I see no moat, no pricing power, no competitive advantage. The Piotroski F-score of 6/9 is modestly encouraging, but that is a crude snapshot, not a reason to invest. Debt-to-equity is not disclosed, which troubles me further: if I cannot see the capital structure, I cannot judge financial health properly. The 52-week range of ₹201.20 to ₹454.10 against today's ₹38 is a glaring red flag — either the data is inconsistent, there has been a corporate action, or something drastic happened. I need an explanation before anything else. I would not buy this merely because it trades below book. Benjamin Graham wanted a margin of safety, but also capable management and a decent return on capital. Here, capital employed earns negative returns. This could be a value trap dressed as an asset play. If the underlying assets are real and monetizable, it could become interesting, but only at a large discount with proper controls. For now, I watch from the sidelines.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer