Betex India (512477)
Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹259.9 |
| Market Cap | ₹39.53 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 13.6 |
| ROCE | 9.56% |
| ROE | 12.32% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 268.52% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 10.45% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹220.05 — ₹635 |
| Sector | Textiles & Apparels |
| Book Value | ₹237.2 |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
This is a microcap textile player at ₹259.90, with a market cap of just ₹40 crore. At a glance, the numbers look interesting: a P/E of 13.60, a P/B of 1.10, and a book value of ₹237.20. That is close to the kind of asset-backed entry Graham liked. But the first question I ask is: what is the quality of earnings? Sales grew only 10.45%, yet profit growth was 268.52%. That tells me this is not a smooth compounder; it is a recovery or cyclical bounce. The latest quarter does show sales of ₹25 crore and net profit of ₹4 crore, so momentum may be real. A Piotroski score of 7/9 also suggests the balance sheet and operations are improving. But I see no moat here. 'Other Textile Products' is a competitive, low-differentiation business, and ROCE of 9.56% is mediocre. ROE of 12.32% is decent but not exceptional. You are paying 1.1 times book for a company that trades 60% below its 52-week high of ₹648. That fall alone tells me the market has seen problems before. Dividends are zero, so return must come from price or fundamentals. The PEG of 0.10 is meaningless because it is based on a 268% profit blip; Graham would ignore such optics. I would need more data—particularly debt and promoter holding—before treating this as a value bargain. This is a possible turnaround, but only for a patient small-cap investor who accepts high risk and does not expect a wide-moat business.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer