Autoriders Intl. (512277)

Asset Play

Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹83.54
Market Cap₹150.06 Cr
P/E Ratio15.42
ROCE19.48%
ROE26.7%
Dividend Yield0.04%
Profit Growth113.64%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth18.94%
52-Week Range₹230.79 — ₹1,031
SectorTransport Services
Book Value₹108.05

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let me look at Autoriders Intl. from the numbers, not the story. It is priced at ₹83.54, with book value of ₹108.05, so I am paying 77 paise for every rupee of assets. That gives a margin of safety Graham prized. The business earns 26.7% on equity and 19.5% on capital employed, so those assets are productive, not idle. A price-to-earnings of 15.4 is not demanding for a company that has grown profits by 113.6% and sales by 18.9%. The PEG ratio of 0.23 is unusually low, but I must treat that with care because a single year's profit surge may not repeat. The Piotroski score of 7/9 suggests healthy fundamentals: improving profitability, leverage and operating efficiency. Still, there are uncomfortable blanks. Debt/equity is unavailable, promoter holding is unavailable, and the 52-week range of ₹189.88–₹1031.00 does not even contain the current price. In a small-cap stock, missing data is often more dangerous than bad data. The dividend yield of 0.04% means I cannot rely on management to return cash; value must come from earnings and eventual re-rating. With a ₹150 crore market cap, this is a very small business, so liquidity and governance matter. The latest quarter's profit of ₹2 crore on ₹24 crore sales shows margins are thin, and any hiccup could hurt. If the figures are reliable, this looks like a classic asset play with growth optionality—buying a productive business below book value. But I would verify the balance sheet, debt, ownership, and the strange price-history data before committing. In the end, price gives me comfort, but the absence of critical disclosure keeps me humble.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer