Rajvi Logitrade (511185)

Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

AI Analysis

AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.

At first glance, this looks like a discovery: a logistics company selling at a P/E of 4.35, with sales up 128.28% and profits up 145.45%. A PEG of 0.03 screams cheap. But Benjamin Graham taught me that figures are a starting point, not a conclusion. This is a ₹1 crore market cap business. That is tiny, and I cannot ignore the warning that the current price of ₹11.29 is below the stated 52-week range of ₹12.44-₹16.64. Something is off, or the data is incomplete. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹26 crore and net profit of ₹1 crore, so the business is real, but I cannot determine quality from these numbers. The return on equity is spectacular at 61.21%, and return on capital employed is 22.83%, but P/B of 2.29 means I am paying more than twice book value for a micro-cap with no dividend and no disclosed promoter holding. Debt/equity is unavailable, so I cannot judge the balance sheet. The Piotroski F-score of 7/9 is encouraging, but it is backward-looking. There is no obvious competitive moat in the figures; logistics solution providers often operate in cut-throat, low-margin markets. Even a wonderful growth rate means little if the business cannot protect its economics. I would need audited financials, cash flow statements, promoter stake, and leverage details before putting a rupee into this. A cheap price can be a value trap. I prefer a fair price on a great, predictable business, not a too-good-to-be-true micro-cap with missing information. In Graham's language, this is a speculative growth stock until proven otherwise. The growth is real on paper, but the margin of safety is impossible to assess with this level of disclosure.

The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer