IST (508807)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 65/100 — STEADY

Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹961
Market Cap₹1,120.92 Cr
P/E Ratio4.67
ROCE13.19%
ROE16.32%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth166.18%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth23.07%
52-Week Range₹518 — ₹961
SectorAuto Components
Book Value₹240.85

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

The first thing I see at IST is a P/E of 4.67. That immediately triggers my bargain instinct, but Buffett taught me that the 'E' must be a true earning number, not a one-off. In the latest quarter, sales are ₹34 crore, while net profit is ₹62 crore. A profit almost twice the revenue is not a normal auto-component business; it smells like an exceptional gain, land sale, or investment gain. If I capitalize that into my P/E, I'm fooling myself. At ₹961, I'm paying 3.99 times book value of ₹240.85. Graham would have demanded a margin of safety; there is very little when you pay four times book. The operational returns are decent—ROE 16.32% and ROCE 13.19%—and the Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests the company is not financially distressed. Sales growth of 23.07% also shows the underlying business has some momentum. But profit growth of 166.18% against that sales growth is too large to be sustainable, and a zero dividend yield means I get no income protection while I wait. With the stock at the top of its 52-week range, ₹518 to ₹961, Mr. Market is already pricing in the good news. Auto components are cyclical; boom-time earnings often produce the lowest P/Es and then normalise. The PEG of 0.05 assumes this leap in profits continues forever, which is not how cycles work. I need to know where those ₹62 crore profits came from. Until I can separate operating earnings from non-operating noise, this looks less like a Graham special and more like a potential value trap.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer