Sh. Rajas. Synt. (503837)

Turnaround

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹11.91
Market Cap₹33.36 Cr
P/E Ratio0
ROCE-30.2%
ROE-134.92%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth65.93%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth3.83%
52-Week Range₹9.15 — ₹20.28
SectorTextiles & Apparels
Book Value₹2.37

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Looking at Sh. Rajas. Synt., my first question is simple: what am I buying? At ₹11.91, the market capitalises this small textile business at ₹33 crore. There is no P/E because there are no positive earnings; the latest quarter shows a net loss of ₹2 crore on sales of only ₹4 crore. Annualised, that loss is large enough to explain an ROE of -134.92% and ROCE of -30.20%. A company that destroys capital at this rate cannot be valued as a steady going concern. The balance sheet still shows book value of ₹2.37 per share, but paying ₹11.91—over 5 times book—for a loss-making, commodity textile maker gives no margin of safety. Sales growth of 3.83% is modest, and the reported profit growth of 65.93% is less impressive when the starting point is a loss; it merely suggests the loss has narrowed. The Piotroski F-score of 6/9 is mildly encouraging, hinting at some improvement, but it does not outweigh the heavy operating losses, zero dividend, and lack of promoter holding disclosure. Debt-to-equity is listed as N/A, which is itself a transparency red flag. With a 52-week range of ₹9.15 to ₹20.28, the stock trades closer to its low, but a low price is not a reason to buy a business with no earnings. I need proof of positive quarterly profits, a clear debt profile, and a return on capital above the company's cost of capital. This is at best a speculative turnaround, not a franchise. As Graham wrote, price is what you pay, value is what you get; here I struggle to see durable value. I would wait on the sidelines until the numbers show real economic progress.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer